- Did lee childs like the jack reacher films full size#
- Did lee childs like the jack reacher films full#
- Did lee childs like the jack reacher films professional#
It was first broken by his first publisher, New York’s G.P. Screw it, I’m going back to Harry Potter.For years there was an unwritten rule that Reacher’s face should never be shown on the cover of a Lee Child book.
Did lee childs like the jack reacher films full#
This has already been a ramble, but I had to mention it….Stephen King talking about how the M-16 in full auto with its almighty 5.56 essentially putting a full grown man into a pirouette from the recoil. Seriously, they added a hammer to a Glock with CGI in post so they could have ants team up and keep the hammer from falling. I do recall watching the first Fast and the Furious with gearhead friends, and they were climbing the walls watching that every bit as bad as I was when I saw Ant-Man. I can’t think of anything else that gets the same treatment as often as firearms. People like to harp on gun guys for getting royally irritated with fiction getting things wrong, but when it comes to firearms, writers and filmmakers really seem to try and go detail heavy without knowing what they’re talking about.
Did lee childs like the jack reacher films full size#
It really takes me out of the book when he’s displaying Reacher’s master level expertise by talking about how this full size 9mm handgun isn’t as good as the other full size 9mm handgun, because the other is….magically 10% more powerful. Him being wrong wouldn’t be nearly the problem it is if he didn’t try to lay it on so thick with the details.
There’s no cordite here, talk about the scent of gunsmoke, the thickening of the air, whatever. Trying to improve your scene by sounding knowledgeable talking about the “Smell of cordite,” bad move. My thoughts on this…if you’re not certain you can get it right, use a verbal flourish instead of freestyling with minutia that you’re unfamiliar with. I wish it didn’t, but if you like the good parts of the Constitution, which I do, you can’t complain about the bad. Persuader has a line: “Never tell a soldier that guns are fun.” My position on gun control is that the U.S. Plus, Reacher makes it clear he doesn’t think guns are toys. So the real gun nuts get a little impatient. I make a few mistakes … wrong ammo, safety catches in the wrong place and so on. did some work on that one, before the diminutive Tom Cruise assumed the role). The movies? Don’t get me started ( Jeremy S. That analysis – by akodo at – is one of many where gun guys take Child to town for his firearms choices and descriptions. Hell, a dan wesson with a bunch of barrels would stand out too. You want something ‘unusual’ so it stands out because that is important for the story line? Mateba revolver in 44.
Did lee childs like the jack reacher films professional#
Seems to me a truely professional shooter would choose a handgun in 45 acp, 10mm, 45 super and either go with a relatively standard sized handgun, be that a glock 20 (15 shots of 10mm!) a doublestack 1911 in 45 super, hell, a good old GI standard 1911 would be great too. I think a standard 44 mag revolver is easier to shoot well thanks to the wonderful single action mode, is less clunky, and you can get one with a shorter barrel for backup, or a longer barrel for hunting…and not supercrazylong like some of the deagle add on barrels. I don’t even think much of the Deagle for hunting or hunter backup. Desert eagle = okay for fun shooting at the range. And no, I don’t think jack reacher could consistantly stick one in his waistband and just walk around.ĭesert eagle = okay for movies because it is very visual. If you are going to keep a Deagle in your car, just in case, might as well toss a rifle in there. For a handgun it is too big for a handgun’s only purpose, to be kept close at and handy. For starters, wth? a desert eagle? turns out the gun was just cover for something else the deceased former detective left behind, but still, to me the DE is not a ‘professionals’ weapon.
0 kommentar(er)
